Intuitions and Conceptual Analysis in Wittgensteinian Pragmatism

In: Analysis and Explication in 20th Century Philosophy
Authors:
David HommenHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf

Search for other papers by David Hommen in
Current site
Brill
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Frauke AlbersmeierHeinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf

Search for other papers by Frauke Albersmeier in
Current site
Brill
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

The nature of intuitions remains a contested issue in (meta-)philosophy. Yet, intuitions are frequently cited in philosophical work, featuring most prominently in conceptual analysis, the philosophical method par excellence. In this paper, we approach the question about the nature of intuitions based on a pragmatist, namely, Wittgensteinian account of concepts. To Wittgenstein, intuitions are just immediate ‘ reactions ’ to certain cognitive tasks. His view provides a distinct alternative to identifying intuitions with either doxastic states or quasi-perceptual experiences. We discuss its implications for intuitions’ role in conceptual analysis and show that a Wittgensteinian account of intuitions is compatible even with ambitious metaphysical projects traditionally associated with this method.

  • Collapse
  • Expand