Bibliography

In: Killing to Prevent Killings?
Author: Roland Hesse
Free access
Bibliography

Alexander, Larry A. 1987. ›Scheffler on the Independence of Agent-Centered Prerogatives From Agent-Centered Restrictions‹. Journal of Philosophy 84 (5): 277283.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Alvarez, Maria. 2016. ›Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation‹. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Brand‐Ballard, Jeffrey. 2004. ›Contractualism and Deontic Restrictions‹. Ethics 114 (2): 269300.

Brook, Richard. 1991. ›Agency and Morality‹. Journal of Philosophy 88 (4): 190212.

Brook, Richard. 1997. ›Is Smith Obligated That(She)Not Kill the Innocent or That She(Not Kill the Innocent): Expressions and Rationales for Deontological Constraints‹. Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4): 451461.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Broome, John. 1991. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Blackwell.

Brown, Campbell. 2011. ›Consequentialize This‹. Ethics 121 (4): 749771.

BVerfG. 2006. Judgment of the First Senate of 15 February 2006–1 BvR 357/05.

Crisp, Roger. 2008. ›Well-Being‹. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Cuneo, Terence. 2007. The Normative Web. An Argument for Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dancy, Jonathan. 1993. Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell.

Dancy, Jonathan. 2004. Ethics Without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dancy, Jonathan. 2013. ›Moral Particularism‹. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Fall 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/moral-particularism/.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Daniels, Norman. 1979. ›Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics‹. Journal of Philosophy 76 (5): 256282.

Darwall, Stephen. 1986. ›Agent-Centered Restrictions from the Inside out‹. Philosophical Studies 50 (3): 291319.

Dreier, James. 1993. ›Structures of Normative Theories‹. The Monist 76 (1): 2240.

Dreier, James. 2011. ›In Defense of Consequentializing‹. In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 1, edited by Mark Timmons, 97119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Edmonds, David. 2015. Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong. Reprint. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Enoch, David. 2009. ›Wouldn’t It Be Nice If P, Therefore, P (for a Moral P).‹ Utilitas 21 (2): 222224.

Fehige, Christoph. 2001. ›Instrumentalism‹. In Varieties of Practical Reasoning, edited by Elijah Millgram, 4976. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Foot, Philippa. 1985. ›Utilitarianism and the Virtues‹. Mind, New Series, 94 (374): 196209.

Gertken, Jan. 2014. ›The Paradox of Deontology Is (Most Likely) Your Paradox Too‹. Unpublished manuscript.

Goodman, Nelson. 1955. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Habib, Allen. 2014. ›Promises‹. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2014. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/promises/.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Hammerton, Matthew. 2016. ›Patient-Relativity in Morality‹. Ethics 127 (1): 0626.

Hare, Caspar. 2013. The Limits of Kindness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harsanyi, John. 1977. ›Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior‹. Social Research 44: 623656.

Heuer, Ulrike. 2011. ›The Paradox of Deontology, Revisited‹. In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, edited by Mark Timmons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Hogan, Brandon. 2010. ›Deontology, Rationality, and Agent-Centered Restrictions‹. Florida Philosophical Review 10 (1): 7587.

Hurley, Paul. 1992. ›The Hidden Consequentialist Assumption‹. Analysis 52 (4): 241248.

Hurley, Paul. 1997. ›Agent-Centered Restrictions: Clearing the Air of Paradox‹. Ethics 108 (1): 120.

Kagan, Shelly. 1984. ›Does Consequentialism Demand Too Much? Recent Work on the Limits of Obligation‹. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3): 239254.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kagan, Shelly. 1989. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kagan, Shelly. 1991. ›Review: Replies to My Critics‹. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4): 919928.

Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Boulder (Colo.): Westview Press.

Kagan, Shelly. 2016. ›What’s Wrong with Speciesism?Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1): 121.

Kamm, Frances. 1989. ›Harming Some to Save Others‹. Philosophical Studies 57 (3): 227260.

Kamm, Frances. 1991. ›Review: Shelly Kagan’s The Limits of Morality‹. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4): 903907.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kamm, Frances. 1992. ›Review: Non-Consequentialism, the Person as an End-in-Itself, and the Significance of Status‹. Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (4): 354389.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kamm, Frances. 1996. Morality, Mortality Volume II: Rights, Duties, and Status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kamm, Frances. 2007. Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Korsgaard, Christine M. 1993. ›The Reasons We Can Share: An Attack on the Distinction Between Agent-Relative and Agent-Neutral Values‹. Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1): 2451.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kumar, Rahul. 1999. ›Defending the Moral Moderate: Contractualism and Common Sense‹. Philosophy and Public Affairs 28 (4): 275309.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

LeBar, Mark. 2009. ›Virtue Ethics and Deontic Constraints‹. Ethics 119 (4): 642671.

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 1996. ›Moral Status and the Impermissibility of Minimizing Violations‹. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (4): 333351.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 1999. ›In What Way Are Constraints Paradoxical?Utilitas 11 (01): 4970.

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2007. ›Why Killing Some People Is More Seriously Wrong than Killing Others‹. Ethics 117 (4): 716738.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. 2009. ›Kamm on Inviolability and Agent-Relative Restrictions‹. Res Publica 15 (2): 165178.

Louise, Jennie. 2004. ›Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella‹. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217): 518536.

Mack, Eric. 1998. ›Deontic Restrictions Are Not Agent-Relative Restrictions‹. Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (2): 61.

Mack, Eric. 2005. ›Prerogatives, Restrictions, and Rights‹. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1): 357393.

Mauch, Christof. 2008. Warum die Amerikaner Auschwitz nicht bombardiert haben Interview by Christoph Heinemann. Deutschlandfunk. http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/warum-die-amerikaner-auschwitz-nicht-bombardiert-haben.694.de.html?dram:article_id=65375.

McCloskey, H. J. 1957. ›An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism‹. Philosophical Review 66 (4): 466485.

McNaughton, David, and Piers Rawling. 1991. ›Agent-Relativity and the Doing- Happening Distinction‹. Philosophical Studies 63 (2): 167185.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

McNaughton, David, and Piers Rawling. 1993. ›Deontology and Agency‹. The Monist 76 (1): 81100.

McNaughton, David, and Piers Rawling. 1995a. ›Agent-Relativity and Terminological Inexactitudes‹. Utilitas 7 (2): 319325.

McNaughton, David, and Piers Rawling. 1995b. ›Value and Agent-Relative Reasons‹. Utilitas 7 (1): 3147.

McNaughton, David, and Piers Rawling. 1998. ›On Defending Deontology‹. Ratio 11 (1): 3754.

McNaughton, David, and Piers Rawling. 2005. ›Deontology‹. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, 424459. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press.

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York (N.Y.): Oxford University Press.

Nagel, Thomas. 1995. ›Personal Rights and Public Space‹. Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (2): 83107.

Nagel, Thomas. 2007. ›The Value of Inviolability‹. In Morality and Self-Interest, edited by Paul Bloomfield. Oxford University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Nelson, William. 2008. ›Kant’s Formula of Humanity‹. Mind 117 (465): 85106.

Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York (N.Y.): Basic Books.

Otsuka, Michael. 1997a. ›Review: Kamm on the Morality of Killing‹. Ethics 108 (1): 197207.

Otsuka, Michael. 1997b. ›Review: Kamm on the Morality of Killing‹. Ethics 108 (1): 197207.

Parfit, Derek. 1981. ›Prudence, Morality, and the Prisoner’s Dilemma‹. Proceedings of the British Academy 65: 539564.

Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, Philip, and Michael Smith. 2000. ›Global Consequentialism‹. In Morality, Rules and Consequences: A Critical Reader, edited by Brad Hooker, Elinor Mason, and Dale Miller. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Piper, Adrian M. S. 1982. ›A Distinction Without a Difference‹. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1): 403435.

Portmore, Douglas W. 2009. ›Consequentializing‹. Philosophy Compass 4 (2): 329347.

Portmore, Douglas W.. 2013a. ›Agent-Centered Restrictions‹. In International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Hugh Lafollette. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Portmore, Douglas W.. 2013b. ›Agent-Relative vs. Agent-Neutral‹. In International Encyclopedia of Ethics, edited by Hugh Lafollette. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Quinn, Warren S. 1989. ›Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing‹. Philosophical Review 98 (3): 287312.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Rakowski, Eric. 1998. Review of Morality, Mortality Vol. II: Rights, Duties, and Status, by Frances Kamm. Mind 107 (426): 492498.

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Raz, Joseph. 1975. Practical Reason and Norms. London: Hutchinson.

Raz, Joseph. 1999. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ridge, Michael. 2011. ›Reasons for Action: Agent-Neutral vs. Agent-Relative‹. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/reasons-agent/.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni. 2009. ›Normative Reasons and the Agent-Neutral/Relative Dichotomy‹. Philosophia 37 (2): 227243.

Rosenberg, Alexander. 1993. ›Contractarianism and the »Trolley« Problem‹. In Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy, all page references to the reprint in Rosenberg 2000, 157171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge (Mass.): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Scanlon, Thomas. 2000. ›Intention and Permissibility, I‹. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1): 301317.

Scanlon, Thomas. 2008. Moral Dimensions. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

Scanlon, Thomas. 2014. Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scheffler, Samuel. 1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions. All page references to the 1994 revised edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Scheffler, Samuel. 1985. ›Agent-Centred Restrictions, Rationality, and the Virtues‹. Mind 94 (375): 409419.

Scheffler, Samuel. 1992. ›Prerogatives Without Restrictions‹. Philosophical Perspectives 6 (3): 377397.

Schmidtz, David. 1990. ›Samuel Scheffler, The Rejection of Consequentialism (New York: Oxford Press, 1982) Vii+ 133 Pp. $9.95 (Paper)‹. Noûs 24 (4): 622627.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Schroeder, Mark. 2007. ›Teleology, Agent-Relative Value, and »Good«‹. Ethics 117 (2): 265295.

Schroeder, Mark. 2008. ›Value Theory‹. URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/value-theory/>.

Shaver, Robert. 2007. ›Contractualism and Restrictions‹. Philosophical Studies 132 (2): 293299.

Skorupski, John. 1995. ›Agent-Neutrality, Consequentialism, Utilitarianism … A Terminological Note‹. Utilitas 7 (1): 49.

Smith, Michael. 2003. ›Neutral and Relative Value after Moore‹. Ethics 113 (3): 576598.

Smith, Michael. 2009. ›Two Kinds of Consequentialism‹. Philosophical Issues Metaethics (19): 257272.

Southwood, Nicholas. 2009. ›Moral Contractualism‹. Philosophy Compass 4 (6): 926937.

Streumer, Bart. 2003. ›Can Consequentialism Cover Everything?Utilitas 15 (2): 237247.

Streumer, Bart. 2007. ›Reasons and Impossibility‹. Philosophical Studies 136 (3): 351384.

Streumer, Bart. 2010. ›Reasons, Impossibility and Efficient Steps: Reply to Heuer‹. Philosophical Studies 151 (1): 7986.

Suikkanen, Jussi. 2009. ›Consequentialism, Constraints and The Good-Relative-To: A Reply to Mark Schroeder‹. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, no. March 2009: 19.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1985. ›The Trolley Problem‹. The Yale Law Journal 94 (6): 13951415.

Vallentyne, Peter. 1988. ›Gimmicky Representations of Moral Theories‹. Metaphilosophy 19 (3–4): 253263.

Vallentyne, Peter. 1989. ›Two Types of Moral Dilemmas‹. Erkenntnis 30 (3): 301318.

Wallace, R. Jay. 2010. ›Reasons, Values and Agent-Relativity‹. Dialectica 64 (4): 503528.

Williams, Bernard. 1973. ›A Critique of Utilitarianism‹. In Utiliarianism. For and Against, 75150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation