Aristotle, Isocrates, and Philosophical Progress

Protrepticus 6, 40.15–20/B55

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
View More View Less
  • 1 Humanities Division (Philosophy), Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

In fragments of the lost Protrepticus, preserved in Iamblichus, Aristotle responds to Isocrates’ worries about the excessive demandingness of theoretical philosophy. Contrary to Isocrates, Aristotle holds that such philosophy is generally feasible for human beings. In defense of this claim, Aristotle offers the progress argument, which appeals to early Greek philosophers’ rapid success in attaining exact understanding. In this paper, I explore and evaluate this argument. After making clarificatory exegetical points, I examine the argument’s premises in light of pressing worries that the argument reasonably faces in its immediate intellectual context, the dispute between Isocrates and Aristotle. I also relate the argument to modern concerns about philosophical progress. I contend that the argument withstands these worries, and thereby constitutes a reasonable Aristotelian response to the Isocratean challenge.

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1959. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= Rhetoric)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis De Anima. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1956. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= DA)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis De Arte Poetica Liber. Kassel, R. (ed., tr.), 1965. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= Poetics)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis De Caelo. Allan, D.J. (ed.), 2005. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= DC)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Ethica Eudemia. Walzer, R.R. & Mingray, J.M. (eds.), 1991. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= EE)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea. Bywater, I. (ed.), 1894. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= EN)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Opera, Vol. III: Librorum Deperditorum Fragmenta. Gigon, O. (ed.), 1987. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Physica. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1950. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= Phys.)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Politica. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1957. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= Pol.)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Qui Ferebantur Librorum Fragmenta. Rose, V. (ed.) 1886. Leipzig: Teubner.

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1958. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= Top. and SE, resp.)

  • [Aristotle.] Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Düring, I. (ed., tr.), 1961. Göteborg: Elanders.

  • Aristotle. Eudemian Ethics, Books I, II, VIII. 2nd ed. Woods, M. (ed., tr.), 1992. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics, 2 vols. Ross, W.D. (ed.), 1924. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (= Met.)

  • Aristotle. On the Parts of Animals I–IV. Lennox, J.G. (tr.), 2001. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (= ROT)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, J.M. (ed.). 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett

  • [Iamblichus.] Iamblichi Protrepticus. Pistelli, H.G. (ed., tr.), 1888. Leibzig: Teubner

  • [Iamblichus.] Iamblichi De Communi Mathematica Scientia. Festa, N. (ed., tr.), 1891. Leipzig: Teubner

  • [Isocrates.] Isocrates. 2 vols. Norlin, G. (ed., tr.), 1929. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • [Isocrates.] Isocrates, III. Van Hook, L. (ed., tr.), 1954. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

  • Ahrensdorf, P.J. 1995. The Death of Socrates and the Life of Philosophy: An Interpretation of Plato’s Phaedo. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Algra, K. 2006. “The Beginnings of Cosmology.” In: A.A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4565.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, J. 2001. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Barney, R. 2012. History and Dialectic in Metaphysics A 3. In: Steel, C. & Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cappelen, H. 2017. Disagreement in Philosophy: An Optimistic Perspective. In: D’Oro, G. & Overgaard, S. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5674.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalmers, D.J. 2015. Why Isn’t There More Philosophical Progress? Philosophy 90(1), 331.

  • Cherniss H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Chroust, A.-H. 1975. Some Additional Fragments of Aristotle’s On Philosophy in Iamblichus’ Protrepticus and Iamblichus’ De Communi Mathematica Scientia. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 37(1), 8994.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Code, A. 2010. Aristotle and the History of Skepticism. In: Nightingale, A.W., & Sedley, D. Ancient Models of Mind: Studies of Human and Divine Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, J.H. 2015. Exhortations to Philosophy: The Protreptics of Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collobert, C. 2002. Aristotle’s Review of the Presocratics: Is Aristotle Finally a Historian of Philosophy? Journal of the History of Philosophy 40(3), 281295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, J.M. 2004. Plato, Isocrates, and Cicero on the Independence of Oratory from Philosophy. In: Cooper, J.M., Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 6580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curzer, H.J. 2012. Aristotle and the Virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • DaVia. C. 2017. Aristotle and the Endoxic Method. Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(3), 383405.

  • Depew, D. 2004. The Inscription of Isocrates into Aristotle’s Practical Philosophy. In: Poulakas, T. & Depew, D. (eds.), Isocrates and Civic Education. Austin: University of Texas Press, 157185.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dietrich, E. 2011. There Is No Progress in Philosophy. Essays in Philosophy 12(2), 329344.

  • Edelstein, L. 1952. Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Ancient Science. Journal of the History of Ideas 13(4), 573604.

  • Edelstein, L. 1967. The Idea of Progress in Classical Antiquity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

  • Einarson, B. 1936. Aristotle’s Protrepticus and the Structure of the Epinomis. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 67, 261285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frede, D. 2012. The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, 185215.

  • Frede, M. 2008. Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy. In: Curd, P. & Graham, D.W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 501529.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guthrie, W.K.C. 1957. Aristotle as a Historian of Philosophy: Some Preliminaries. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 77(1), 3541.

  • Guthrie, W.K.C. 1978. A History of Greek Philosophy, Volume 1: The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Halliwell, S. 1998. Aristotle’s Poetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hutchinson, D.H. & Johnson, M.R. 2005. Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, 193294.

  • Hutchinson, D.H. 2018. Protreptic and Apotreptic: Aristotle’s Dialogue Protrepticus. In: Alieva, O., Kotzé, A. & Van der Meeren, S. (eds.), When Wisdom Calls: Philosophical Protreptic in Antiquity. Turnhout: Brepols, 111154.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutchinson, D.H. (unpublished). Aristotle, Protrepticus: Citations, Fragments, Paraphrases, and Other Evidence. URL: www.protrepticus.info.

  • Hutchinson, D.H. (unpublished). The Antidosis of Isocrates and Aristotle’s Protrepticus. URL: www.protrepticus.info.

  • Jaeger, W. 1944. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture, Volume III: The Conflict of Cultural Ideals in the Age of Plato. Highet (tr.) 1944. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original: Jaeger, W. 1944. Die Formung des griechischen Menschen, Band 3: Das Zeitalter der großen Bildner und Bildungssysteme. Berlin: De Gruyter).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jaeger, W. 1948. Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development, 2nd ed. Robinson (tr.) 1962. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original: Jaeger, W. 1923. Aristoteles. Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kraut, R. 2006. How to Justify Ethical Propositions: Aristotle’s Method. In: Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Malden: Blackwell, 7695.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laks, A. 2009. Aporia Zero (Metaphysics, B 1, 995a24–995b4) In: Crubellier, M. & Laks, A. (eds.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2546.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leunissen, M. 2012. Aristotle on Natural Character and Its Implications for Moral Development. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(4), 507530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Long, A.A. 2006. Aristotle and the History of Greek Scepticism. In: Long, A.A., From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Melzer, A. 2014. Philosophy Between the Lines: The Lost History of Esoteric Writing. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Nightingale, A.W. 1995. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ober, J. Democracy’s Wisdom: An Aristotelian Middle Way for Collective Judgment. American Political Science Review 107, 104122.

  • Owens, J. 1978. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics: A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought, 3rd ed. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Politis, V. 2004. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Aristotle and the Metaphysics. London, New York: Routledge.

  • Seggiaro, C. 2012. Los conceptos aristotélicos de ἐπιστήµη y σοφία en la Metafísica A-a y su correlato en el Protréptico, Nova Tellvs 30, 4374.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stoljar, D. 2017. Philosophical Progress: In Defense of a Reasonable Optimism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Tell, H. 2011. Plato’s Counterfeit Sophists. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.

  • Van der Meeren, S., (ed., trs.) 2011. Exhortation à la philosophie: Le dossier grec: Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

  • Walker, M.D. 2018. Aristotle on the Uses of Contemplation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Walker, M.D. 2019. The Appeal to Easiness in Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Ancient Philosophy 39(2), 319333.

  • Wareh, T. 2012. The Theory and Practice of Life: Isocrates and the Philosophers. Cambridge, MA: Center for Hellenic Studies: Harvard University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 85 85 28
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Views & Downloads 1 1 1