Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Pyrrhonism and the Dialectical Methods
The Aims and Argument of Outlines of Pyrrhonism II
In: History of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisAbstract
The aim of this paper is to show how Outlines of Pyrrhonism II constitutes an original, ambitious, and unified skeptical inquiry into logic. My thesis is that Sextus’ argument in Book II is meant to accomplish both its stated goal (to investigate the topics typically grouped together by dogmatists under the heading of “logic”) and an unstated goal. The unstated goal is, in my view, interesting in itself and sheds new light on Sextus’ methodology. The goal is: to suspend judgement on the effectiveness of dogmatic methodologies.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Sextus Empiricus. Against the Ethicists. Bett, R. (tr.), 1997. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Bett, R. (tr.), 2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sextus Empiricus. Against the Physicists. Bett, R. (tr.), 2012. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Galen. On the Therapeutic Method, Books I and II. Hankinson, R.J. (tr.), 1991. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism. 2nd ed. Annas, J. & Barnes, J. (eds., trs.), 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Algra, K. & Ierodiakonou, K. 2015. Introduction. In: Algra, K. & Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–32.
-
Allen, J. 2001. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Asmis, E. 1984. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
-
Barnes, J. 1980. Proof destroyed. In: Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M.F. & Barnes, J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 161–181.
-
Barnes, J. 1990. The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Barnes, J. 1991. Galen on Logic and Therapy. In: Durling, R.J. & Kudlien, F. (eds.), Galen’s Method of Healing. Leiden: Brill, 50–102.
-
Barnes, J. 2007. Sextan Scepticism. In: Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 322–335.
-
Bett, R. 2013. A Sceptic Looks at Art (but not Very Closely): Sextus Empiricus on Music. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3(3), 155–181.
-
Bett, R. 2019. How to be a Pyrrhonist: The Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Brisson, L. 2006. Contre les arithméticiens (Pros arithmētikous) ou contre ceux qui enseignent que les nombres sont des principes. In: Delattre, J. (ed.), Sur le Contre les professeurs de Sextus Empiricus. Lille: Presses de l’Université de Charles-de-Gaulle-Lille 3, 67–77.
-
Bronstein, D. 2016. Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Brunschwig, J. 1980. Proof defined. In: Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M.F. & Barnes, J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 125–160.
-
Brunschwig, J. 1988. Sextus Empiricus on the kritêrion: The Sceptic as Conceptual Legate. In: Dillon, J.M. & Long, A.A. (eds.), The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 145–175.
-
Corti, L. forthcoming. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Arithmeticians. Leiden: Brill.
-
De Lacy, P. 1991. Galen’s Response to Skepticism. Illinois Classical Studies 16(1–2), 283–306.
-
Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. London: Duckworth.
-
Fine, G. 2014. The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Frede, M. 1987. On Galen’s Epistemology. In: Nutton, V. (ed.), Galen: Problems and Prospects. London: Wellcome Institute, 65–98. Reprinted In: Frede, M. (ed.), 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Geach, P.T. 1966. Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary. Monist 50, 369–382.
-
Hankinson, R.J. 1995. The Sceptics. London: Routledge.
-
Hintikka, J. 1973. Logic, Language-Games and Information. Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Lammenranta, M. 2008. The Pyrrhonian Problematic. In: Greco, J. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–33.
-
Magee, J. 1998. Ancii Manlii Severini Boethii De divisione liber. Leiden: Brill.
-
Mates, B. 1996. The Skeptic Way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Olfert, C.M.M. 2015. Skeptical Investigation and its Perks: Diog. Laert. 9.69–70 and 79–89. In: Vogt, K.M. (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 147–170.
-
Palmer, J. 2000. Skeptical Investigation. Ancient Philosophy 20(2), 351–375.
-
Perin, C. 2010. The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Schmitt, J. (unpublished manuscript). Sextus on the Expertise Necessary for Solving Sophisms.
-
Striker, G. 1974. Κριτήριον τῆς Ἀληθείας. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Jahrgang 1974(2). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
-
Striker, G. 2001. Scepticism as a kind of philosophy. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83(2), 113–129.
-
Thorsrud, H. 2009. Ancient Scepticism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Vlasits, J. 2020. The First Riddle of Induction: Sextus and the Formal Learning Theorists. In: Vogt, K.M. & Vlasits, J. (eds.), Epistemology after Sextus Empiricus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 237–253.
-
Vogt, K.M. 2012. Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Williams, M. 1988. Skepticism without Theory. Review of Metaphysics 41(3), 547–588.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 281 | 223 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 1 |
Pyrrhonism and the Dialectical Methods
The Aims and Argument of Outlines of Pyrrhonism II
In: History of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisAbstract
The aim of this paper is to show how Outlines of Pyrrhonism II constitutes an original, ambitious, and unified skeptical inquiry into logic. My thesis is that Sextus’ argument in Book II is meant to accomplish both its stated goal (to investigate the topics typically grouped together by dogmatists under the heading of “logic”) and an unstated goal. The unstated goal is, in my view, interesting in itself and sheds new light on Sextus’ methodology. The goal is: to suspend judgement on the effectiveness of dogmatic methodologies.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 281 | 223 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 1 |