Essence, Propria and Essentialist Explanation

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Author: Zeyu Chi1
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty of Philosophy, Peking UniversityBeijingChina
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In this paper I propose a notion of propria inspired by Aristotle, on which propria are non-essential, necessary properties explained by the essence of a thing. My proposal differs from the characterization of propria by Kit Fine and Kathrin Koslicki: unlike Fine, the relation of explanation on my account can’t be assimilated to a notion of logical entailment. In disagreement with Koslicki, I suggest that the explanatory relation at issue needs not be necessary. My account of essence is conceptually parsimonious: it illuminates the contribution of essence to explanation without relying on obscure notions such as Aristotelian form or identity.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 605 605 17
Full Text Views 5 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 13 13 1