Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Das Cogito als Fundament des Wissens
In: History of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisAbstract
In this essay, I discuss three readings of Descartes’ Meditations. According to the first reading, “I exist” is for Descartes the foundation of our knowledge. This reading is dismissed on the grounds that, in his view, as long as God’s existence is not proven there is a good reason to doubt this proposition. Proponents of the second reading claim that there are two kinds of Cartesian knowledge: perfect and imperfect knowledge. The meditator has imperfect knowledge of “I exist” before God’s existence is proven. Subsequently, she acquires perfect knowledge of various metaphysical theorems. This reading is repudiated, too. I argue for a third reading, according to which “I think” – and not “I exist” – is the foundation of our knowledge.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Descartes, R. Œuvres de Descartes. Adam, C. & Tannery, P. (eds.), 1964–1974. 11 Bände. (überarb. Aufl.) Paris: Vrin. (= AT)
-
Descartes, R. Meditationen über die Grundlagen der Philosophie mit den sämtlichen Einwänden und Erwiderungen. Buchenau, A. (ed., tr.), 1915. Hamburg: Meiner. (= B)
-
Descartes, R. Meditationen. Dreisprachige Parallelausgabe. Latein – Französisch – Deutsch. Schmidt, A. (ed., tr.), 2004. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. (= S)
-
Broughton, J. 2002. Descartes’s Method of Doubt. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press.
-
Carriero, J. 2008. The Cartesian Circle and the Foundations of Knowledge. In: Broughton, J. & Carriero, J. (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Malden – Oxford – Carlton: Blackwell Publishing, 302–318.
-
Carriero, J. 2009. Between Two Worlds. A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton – Oxford: Princeton University Press.
-
Clark, M. 2019. Faculties, Knowledge, and Reasons for Doubt in the Cartesian Circle. Mind 128(511), 647–672.
-
Cottingham, J. 1986. Descartes. Oxford – Cambridge, MA.: Blackwell.
-
Curley, E. 2006. The Cogito and the Foundations of Knowledge. In: Gaukroger, S. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Malden – Oxford – Carlton: Blackwell Publishing, 30–47.
-
Della Rocca, M. 2005. Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(1), 1–33.
-
Della Rocca, M. 2006. Judgment and Will. In: Gaukroger, S. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Malden – Oxford – Carlton: Blackwell Publishing, 142–159.
-
Della Rocca, M. 2011. Taking the Fourth: Steps toward a New (Old) Reading of Descartes. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35(1), 93–110.
-
DeRose, K. 1992. Descartes, Epistemic Principles, Epistemic Circularity, and Scientia. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73(3), 220–238.
-
Feldman, F. 1975. Epistemic Appraisal and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophical Studies 27(1), 37–55.
-
Fulmer, E. & Ragland, C.P. 2017. Against the New Cartesian Circle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47(1), 66–74.
-
Gewirth, A. 1941. The Cartesian Circle. The Philosophical Review 50(4), 368–395.
-
Gewirth, A. 1970. The Cartesian Circle Reconsidered. The Journal of Philosophy 67(19), 668–685.
-
Gewirth, A. 1971. Descartes: Two Disputed Questions. The Journal of Philosophy 68(9), 288–296.
-
Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Hegel, G.W.F. Werke, Band 20. Moldenhauer, E. & Michel, K.M. (eds.), 1971. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
-
Heidegger, M. Gesamtausgabe, Band 2. von Herrmann, F.-W. (ed.), 1977. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-
Kemmerling, A. 1996. Ideen des Ichs. Studien zu Descartes’ Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
-
Kenny, A. 1968. Descartes. A Study of His Philosophy. New York – Toronto: Random House.
-
Lewis, D. 1996. Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74(4), 549–567.
-
Loeb, L.E. 1992. The Cartesian Circle. In: Cottingham, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge – New York – Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 200–235.
-
Murdoch, D. 1999. The Cartesian Circle. The Philosophical Review 108(2), 221–244.
-
Rickless, S.C. 2005. The Cartesian Fallacy Fallacy. Noûs 39(2), 309–336.
-
Schütt, H.-P. 1998. Die Adoption des „Vaters der modernen Philosophie“. Studien zu einem Gemeinplatz der Ideengeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
-
van Cleve, J. 1979. Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle. The Philosophical Review 88(1), 55–91.
-
Wilson, M.D. 1982. Descartes. 2. korrigierte Aufl. London – New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 179 | 180 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 9 | 9 | 2 |
Das Cogito als Fundament des Wissens
In: History of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisAbstract
In this essay, I discuss three readings of Descartes’ Meditations. According to the first reading, “I exist” is for Descartes the foundation of our knowledge. This reading is dismissed on the grounds that, in his view, as long as God’s existence is not proven there is a good reason to doubt this proposition. Proponents of the second reading claim that there are two kinds of Cartesian knowledge: perfect and imperfect knowledge. The meditator has imperfect knowledge of “I exist” before God’s existence is proven. Subsequently, she acquires perfect knowledge of various metaphysical theorems. This reading is repudiated, too. I argue for a third reading, according to which “I think” – and not “I exist” – is the foundation of our knowledge.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 179 | 180 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 9 | 9 | 2 |