Save

On Anselm’s Ontological Argument in ProslogionII

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
View More View Less
  • 1 Philosophy Department, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University6429, Stanford, CA, USA
  • | 2 Philosophy Department, Faculty of Arts, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

Formulations of Anselm’s ontological argument have been the subject of a number of recent studies. We examine these studies in light of Anselm’s text and (a) respond to criticisms that have surfaced in reaction to our earlier representations of the argument, (b) identify and defend a more refined representation of Anselm’s argument on the basis of new research, and (c) compare our representation of the argument, which analyzes that than which none greater can be conceived as a definite description, to a representation that analyzes it as an arbitrary name.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 438 438 58
Full Text Views 10 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 29 29 2