Save

Das Cogito als Fundament des Wissens

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
View More View Less
  • 1 Philosophisches Seminar, Philosophische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg9144, Heidelberg, Deutschland
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

In this essay, I discuss three readings of Descartes’ Meditations. According to the first reading, “I exist” is for Descartes the foundation of our knowledge. This reading is dismissed on the grounds that, in his view, as long as God’s existence is not proven there is a good reason to doubt this proposition. Proponents of the second reading claim that there are two kinds of Cartesian knowledge: perfect and imperfect knowledge. The meditator has imperfect knowledge of “I exist” before God’s existence is proven. Subsequently, she acquires perfect knowledge of various metaphysical theorems. This reading is repudiated, too. I argue for a third reading, according to which “I think” – and not “I exist” – is the foundation of our knowledge.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 88 88 40
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 2 2 0