Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 10 of 28 items for :
- All: "wisdom" x
- Chapters/Articles x
. This examination will show that Heraclitus frames his own thought in terms of his rebuke of this naĆÆve view of wisdom and the world, which came before him. I will argue that Heraclitus does not advise avoiding experience of many things, rather, he advises rejecting experience of things as merely many
There seems to be tension between portrayals of Socrates as both a committed philosopher and a pious man. For instance, one might doubt Socratesā commitment to philosophy since he seems to irrationally defer to a daimonion. On the other hand, the fact that he challenges messages from Oracles (Apology 21ā22) and the godsā role concerning the origin of the pious (Euthyphro 10ā15) draws into question Socratesā piety. In this paper, I argue that Socratic piety and rationality are not only compatible, but they are also symbiotic. Socrates could not be rational without being pious, nor could he be pious without being rational because, for him, care and curiosity are intimately intertwined. In this regard, Socratesā epistemology, when applied, resembles Karl Popperās falsificationism. For Socrates, maintaining human wisdom amounts to regular purification of oneās belief-system. In addition, this maintenance is functionally identical to caring for oneās soul, which is morally imperative.
Abstract: Socrates in the Apology takes an adventurous approach to belief. Although he lacks knowledge, he holds strong beliefs about virtue and the human good. These beliefs count as wisdom only if they are supported by the ability to explain why they are true, and Socrates lacks this ability. To understand why Socrates holds these beliefs, Gorgias 481cā482c is examined. He claims there always to say the same thing and to agree with himself. His beliefs allow him to maintain a stable core of harmonious beliefs. This provides some evidence of the truth of his beliefs and forms one aspect of his human wisdom.
ā. E 33.9 In short, if you are your own harshest critic, the slanders of others will not be painful cuts. And as one makes progress as a philosopher, as these skills become second nature, one should resist the temptation to start priding oneself as someone of great wisdom. And one should
āasserts: Nothing can exist outside God, as alien or exterior to him. [ā¦] There is only the one God in his divine Wisdom, and outside him nothing whatever. What is not God is nothing . 3 Bulgakov does not mean to propose that what is not identical to the one God does not exist; for obviously there are many
ā De Communi Mathematica Scientia (= DCMS ) (82.17ā22). 5 Here, Aristotle argues for the claim that philosophyāthe āacquisition and use of wisdomā ( ktÄsis te kai chrÄsis sophias : 6, 40.2ā3/B53, cf. 6, 37.7ā9/B8)āis easy : For with no pay coming from people to those who philosophize (ĻĪæįæĻ
1 The Importance of Inquiry for Understanding (Ancient) Philosophy At least since Socrates, philosophy has been understood as the desire for acquiring a special kind of knowledge, namely wisdom, a kind of knowledge that human beings ordinarily do not possess. According to ancient thinkers
in Kantian ethics. It nevertheless performs in a way, that is observed as accurate moral behaviour. Thus, the machine has in the end something that Aristotle would call phronesis , which in the context of moral action could be understood as practical wisdom, the ability to act in the right way under