Search Results

Author: Keith Begley

. This examination will show that Heraclitus frames his own thought in terms of his rebuke of this naïve view of wisdom and the world, which came before him. I will argue that Heraclitus does not advise avoiding experience of many things, rather, he advises rejecting experience of things as merely many

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Author: Audrey Anton

There seems to be tension between portrayals of Socrates as both a committed philosopher and a pious man. For instance, one might doubt Socrates’ commitment to philosophy since he seems to irrationally defer to a daimonion. On the other hand, the fact that he challenges messages from Oracles (Apology 21–22) and the gods’ role concerning the origin of the pious (Euthyphro 10–15) draws into question Socrates’ piety. In this paper, I argue that Socratic piety and rationality are not only compatible, but they are also symbiotic. Socrates could not be rational without being pious, nor could he be pious without being rational because, for him, care and curiosity are intimately intertwined. In this regard, Socrates’ epistemology, when applied, resembles Karl Popper’s falsificationism. For Socrates, maintaining human wisdom amounts to regular purification of one’s belief-system. In addition, this maintenance is functionally identical to caring for one’s soul, which is morally imperative.

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Author: Andrew Payne

Abstract: Socrates in the Apology takes an adventurous approach to belief. Although he lacks knowledge, he holds strong beliefs about virtue and the human good. These beliefs count as wisdom only if they are supported by the ability to explain why they are true, and Socrates lacks this ability. To understand why Socrates holds these beliefs, Gorgias 481c–482c is examined. He claims there always to say the same thing and to agree with himself. His beliefs allow him to maintain a stable core of harmonious beliefs. This provides some evidence of the truth of his beliefs and forms one aspect of his human wisdom.

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
In: Focus: Ancient and Medieval Philosophy/Schwerpunkt: Antike und Mittelalterliche Philosophie
Author: Uwe Meixner

—asserts: Nothing can exist outside God, as alien or exterior to him. […] There is only the one God in his divine Wisdom, and outside him nothing whatever. What is not God is nothing . 3 Bulgakov does not mean to propose that what is not identical to the one God does not exist; for obviously there are many

In: Panentheism and Panpsychism
Author: Lukas Brand

in Kantian ethics. It nevertheless performs in a way, that is observed as accurate moral behaviour. Thus, the machine has in the end something that Aristotle would call phronesis , which in the context of moral action could be understood as practical wisdom, the ability to act in the right way under

In: Artificial Intelligence

. As such, he understands evil when setting out to create a world with which to share his goodness and wisdom in creative power, but he does not will it. He is bound both by conceptual and ethical necessity to act in accordance with his infinite goodness and share with a finite reality the fullness

In: Panentheism and Panpsychism
Author: Nicole Rathgeb

, schreibt beispielsweise John Wisdom, haben wir nicht den Eindruck, über Wörter zu sprechen. 5 Wenn wir darauf bestehen, dass die Aussage »Eine Person kann nicht an zwei Orten gleichzeitig sein« eigentlich vom Wort »Person« (in Kombination mit den anderen involvierten Wörtern) handelt oder jedenfalls wahr

In: Die Begriffsanalyse im 21. Jahrhundert

: Fortress . Mullins , R.T. ( 2016 ) » The Difficulty with Demarcating Panentheism .« Sophia , 55 , 325 - 346 . Oord , T.J ( 2004 ) Science of Love: The Wisdom of Well-Being . Philadelphia : Templeton Press . Oord , T.J. ( 2010 a) The Nature of Love: A Theology . St

In: Panentheism and Panpsychism
Author: Peter Rohs

objectively valid theistic explanations. Since theism cannot be proved, explanations based on it can have no claim to objective validity. For this, they should rely on a valid proof of God. A believer might explain the intelligibility of the world with God’s intentions and marvel at God for his wisdom; from

In: Mind and the Present