Search Results
apagogical proof from the cognitive point of view. In the third section, I will expose how Kant characterises the Law of the Excluded Middle ( LEM ) as a logical principle. I will distinguish different realms of validity for LEM , which rely on the nature of the representations that compose the judgements
example, that the Law of the Excluded Middle does not apply here; or that it is wrong to say that something timeless has been the case, even if it (timelessly) is the case. The Near Miss takes no stance on these issues either. Once more, it merely affirms that if it has at some time been the case that a
.W.F. Hegel) develops a paraconsistent logic for the “both-states-option” by restriction of the law of non-contradiction (LNC) (161–170), while Ch. Hamblin sacrifices the law of the excluded middle (LEM) by choosing the 206 Buchbesprechungen – Book Reviews “neither/nor-option” (171–182). D. Bostock, B
: (EM) TA∨FA, or TA∨¬TA Law of the excluded middle (Cons) ¬(TA∧FA), or ¬(TA∧¬TA) Law of consistency 106 Jerzy Perzanowski (Red) (TA→ FA)→ FA Law of reductio ad absurdum (DS) TA∧FA→ B T&F form of Duns Scotus’s Law Several old classical theorems, expressed in T&F terms, look, as you see, quite intriguing
a privileged (unrevisable or a priori) place at its logico-conceptual core. Thus: ‘[r]evision even of the logical law of the excluded middle has been proposed as a means of simplifying quantum mechanics; and what difference is there in principle between such a shift and the shift whereby Kepler
the character of experience. Similarly the law of the excluded middle formulates our decision that whatever is not designated by a certain term shall be designated by its negative. It declares oUf purpose to make, for every term, a complete dichotomy of experience, instead - as we might choose